The window is open, but it closes sooner than you think
Use tooling to collect time sheets and training plans—saves weeks of work.
Link learning objectives directly to HR processes so that the grant does not become an isolated island.
Embed micro-learning and on-the-job coaching, two formats reviewers love to see.
Secure a learning culture: staff stay longer, knowledge stays in-house.
Still I often hear, "Are you sure it is worth the effort?" What strikes me is that companies mainly dread the paperwork. Understandable. Yet the scheme funds not only the training itself; it also pays for advice on learning and development (L&D) and for measuring impact.
Auditing the company to map learning needs
Drafting a training and development plan
Implementing interim upskilling or e-learning
Evaluation and embedding in daily practice
Be aware: everything must be demonstrable—no proof, no euros.
Grant percentage: 80% for SMEs, 60% for foundations in the agriculture, hospitality and leisure sectors
Maximum amount: €25,000 per application, open twice a year
Allocation: first come, first served, plus a lottery if oversubscribed
A step-by-step approach based on dozens of successful applications.
Talk to departments, not only HR. Operations often knows where the real pain is. Gather examples: "New technicians drop out because onboarding is too fragmented." That kind of detail is gold in your application.
Avoid jargon. Formulate an appealing goal: "Within 18 months every service engineer can resolve a complex fault independently." Such a concrete ambition stands out to reviewers.
• Planning: allow for four milestones (start, halfway, end, embedding) • Evidence: screenshots of e-learning, attendance lists, evaluations • Budget: break down per activity and record time in hours as well as euros
Show that learning is not a standalone project but an accelerator for your growth plan. Therefore link KPIs (fault resolution time) to L&D activities (diagnostic training).
The portal feels clinical; add a brief cover note that conveys your passion for development. It can make that small but decisive difference—I have heard jury members say so.
Ready to dive in together?
At Spartner we have a soft spot for companies that put their people first. If this article makes you think "I really want to get started", then please reach out. We are happy to spar informally and see whether we can add value, with no fuss and no sales tricks.
The SLIM scheme is sometimes dismissed as a "micro-grant"—too small to spend energy on. In practice the story is different.
Strict framework: activities outside learning and development are excluded immediately
Accountability: every receipt and every training session must be archived
Timing: align your planning with the application rounds or lose half a year
Cost savings up to 80% on crucial training projects
Acceleration towards a culture of continuous learning
Additional legitimacy towards shareholders or the board
As mentioned earlier: the paperwork is demanding but temporary. The new learning structure delivers returns for years.
In reality an application often fails on details. Here are a few tips we internally call "grant-slash-hacks".
Create a checklist in Trello or Asana with columns "draft – review – evidence – done". Tick off only when the evidence is ready as a digital attachment.
Sketch a persona: Els, 34, lead technician, wants to advance but lacks complex case studies. Such a narrative angle makes your pain point come alive.
An extra pair of eyes avoids mistakes in VAT explanations or hourly rates. One misplaced decimal can cause rejection—such a waste.
That said, do not overdo it. The reviewer is not a robot, but certainly critical.
Government already hints at greater emphasis on digital skills and green transitions. Expect projects on data analytics, AI training and circular processes to earn extra points.
Increase in maximum grant to €30,000
Mandatory KPI reporting after 12 months
Bonus points for collaboration with trade associations
Rumour even has it that a fast-track will appear for small applications under €5,000—handy for pilot projects.
Yield.inc is a new asset manager in the Netherlands that focuses on excellent customer experience, sustainability and technology. When faced with the question of whether to develop our platform in-house or with a partner, we got in touch with Spartner. We are still 100% behind the choice for Spartner because we own the source code and with Spartner, a deal really is a deal, whether it concerns the delivery date or the agreed budget!
Hans Lugtenberg Partner at Yield Inc.
Spartner is involved and contributes in our search for innovations and always delivers top-notch work. After the first Huurda.nl version got out-dated, we collaboratively launched a completely new version in 2020.
Read moreNorbert Wegter Owner of 123wonen and Expat Homes Holland
Spartner has created a customized portal for us for the accountability of large-scale collaborative projects. This enables us and our partners to execute and account for their plans in a shared environment that is secure, transparent, and manageable. The pragmatic and flexible collaboration with Spartner has ensured that we have quickly achieved a functional and user-friendly environment.
Jurjen Terpstra Managing Partner at Wecreate Consulting
In 2020, we transferred the development of Lynn to Spartner. As a result of their fast development process, the Lynn platform achieves an increasingly central role in the legal world.
Read moreMarco Caspers Software Development Manager at Lynn Legal
Innovation and change are not always welcomed with equal enthusiasm by our employees, man is a creature of habit but as a company you have to dare to move forward and the need for a contemporary drawing program for the realization of various constructions with our Masterbloc bricks was high. For us but also for Spartner, this challenge was a bit of pioneering and together we had to overcome some hurdles to arrive at a beautiful and efficient business tool. A development and learning process for both parties, in which the feedback of questions and desired adjustments by our employees to Spartner was always in good consultation and we could count on quick feedback and targeted solutions. We continue to exchange experiences with Spartner and look back and forward to a successful collaboration.
Read moreBjorn Gubbels Owner of Masterbloc
With weekly calls, using our Azure DevOps sprint system, Spartner actively works together with our innovation, communication and software development departments.
Read moreMarco Leenders Head of Automation
The projectteam of the city of Groningen is very enthusiastic about the "Roomfinder" platform.
Read moreGemeente Groningen Projectteam
We requested custom help to a performance challenge we had in our implementation of Laravel Excel. I was amazed how quickly these Laravel artisans achieved significant performance gains, which saved us a lot of development time.
Read moreJosh Mountain Co-Founder at IncentivePilot.com
Throughout the great years that we cooperate with Spartner (previously Maatwebsite, Ed.), our software has been developed continuously. Students and landlords actively work with features like allocation, payments, chat, contract generation and more.
Read moreMaurice Evers Head of Student Housing Department
The pro-active approach of Spartner was crucial in understanding the complexity of the eHerkenning network.
Read moreMaarten Bremer CTO / Founder Ensured
.webp)
As jurists with knowledge of IT, we highly value quality; within code, but also in process. The high work-level and trustworthiness of Spartner gives us the capacity to continuously create innovative features.
Read moreNiels Winters Managing Director JuriBlox
The spring round usually closes at the end of March and the autumn round at the end of September. Exact dates are published each year in the Government Gazette (Staatscourant), so check as soon as they go live.
Only when they collaborate within an SME partnership. A solo self-employed professional falls outside the scheme, as the legislator truly targets structural organisational development.
Allow roughly three to five months after the final declaration. Your completion report must first be approved; payment follows afterwards. Patience is a virtue (and sometimes a frustration).
Yes, provided the content clearly matches your learning objectives and all invoices are neatly translated into Dutch. The reviewer must be able to read what you bought.
Certainly, but not for the same project. You must show that each application represents a new step in the learning curve. Repetition without innovation will be rejected.
The grant will be reduced proportionally. Keep a firm grip on your budget and report major changes in good time to avoid unpleasant surprises later.
You can, but you must provide a sound reason (for example force majeure). Any advance payments already made may be reclaimed in part. Think carefully before pulling the plug.
Attendance lists, evaluation forms, invoices, proof of payment and a clear final report. Without these documents the grant is likely to be reclaimed in whole or in part.
Absolutely. A digital learning platform or LMS shows that you embed learning structurally—something reviewers love. It may give you that extra edge.
We prefer partnership over models that create short-term incentives. Creating a realistic plan together—that is what we believe in.
Whether you have a new idea or an existing system that needs attention?
We are happy to have a conversation with you.
Call, email, or message us on WhatsApp.
We have received your message. We will contact you shortly. Something went wrong sending your message. Please check all the fields.