Connect your systems
with APIs

In a world packed with cloud apps, legacy systems and data silos there is only one goal: smooth collaboration without detours. Smart API development and integrations make that happen — stable, secure and scalable. We connect systems so you can speed up processes, enrich insights and launch new propositions without reinventing the wheel.

From stand-alone tools to cohesion

Friction-free connections

Build an integration layer that grows with you and manage APIs from design to operations — not just for today, but for tomorrow as well.

Automate

Eliminate manual work with event-driven integrations, webhooks and robust APIs. Think automatic synchronisation of customer data, orders and inventory. Fewer errors, less waiting — more focus on value. And you instantly see what happened when.

Integrate

Connect CRM, ERP, PIM, WMS and data warehouses via REST, GraphQL or messaging. Clear contracts (OpenAPI) and versioning keep changes under control, even when your landscape evolves rapidly or spans multiple clouds.

Secure

Protect integrations with OAuth2, mTLS, rate limiting and policies. Make roles and permissions explicit. Log, trace and monitor — from gateway to backend. Knowing exactly who used what and why prevents incidents and supports audits.

Scale

Use an API gateway and caching for peak loads, and design for fail-over. Microservices, iPaaS or hybrid? Choose what suits your use case. In short: grow without your integrations cracking under pressure.

Like good logistics, but for data.

APIs ensure information arrives just-in-time, at the right place, in the right format — no spreadsheet ping-pong required.
Like good logistics, but for data

Like good logistics, but for data.

Why this matters now

What strikes me is that integration is often the underestimated foundation. When systems really talk, teams move faster and decisions improve. And, not unimportant, errors disappear quietly.

Our perspective

In practice you often see that “quickly connecting” grows into a strategic theme: security, operations, lifecycle, ownership. So we tackle it end-to-end — from API design and governance to monitoring and version control.

Immediate impact

Less double work, consistent data and room to experiment with new services. Because those who integrate properly can innovate faster without piling up technical debt.

Key benefits at a glance:

  • faster data flow through real system integrations

  • fewer errors thanks to clear contracts and validation

  • scalable via gateway, caching and asynchronous patterns

  • more secure through policies, authentication and auditing

  • future-proof with versioning and solid documentation

From idea to integration that keeps working.

No rigid checklist, but a proven route we apply flexibly.

Step 1 — discovery and context

Step 1 — discovery and context.

We start with the question behind the question. Which processes stall, where is the real bottleneck, which systems need to talk? We map data flows and assign ownership per domain. Not boring, but crucial. Sometimes a simple webhook suffices, sometimes an API gateway is unavoidable. We also discuss security requirements (OAuth2, scopes, IP restrictions) and compliance.

Step 2 — API design and contracts

Step 2 — API design and contracts.

Design-first works: we capture endpoints, payloads, status codes and error handling with OpenAPI (or GraphQL schemas). That contract is the single source of truth for teams. We pick naming conventions, version policy and validation rules. And yes, documentation is part of it — preferably auto-generated so it stays current. This is where you save long-term time because everyone means the same thing.

Step 3 — build and integrate

Step 3 — build and integrate.

We develop the API or integration layer with focus on idempotency, retries and time-outs. Where possible asynchronous (event-driven, queue) to absorb peak loads and decouple systems. Where needed we synchronise selectively (upserts, change data capture). A gateway or iPaaS enforces policies, throttling and observability. Sounds like a lot, but it prevents even more hassle later.

Step 4 — secure and test

Step 4 — secure and test.

Security is not a final tick-box, yet we explicitly verify: authentication, authorisation, input validation, rate limiting and secrets management. We test functionally, contractually (via contract testing), performance and resilience (circuit breakers). Logs and traces via for instance OpenTelemetry make chain errors traceable. Pro tip: test your error paths, not just the happy flow.

Step 5 — deploy and operate

Step 5 — deploy and operate.

We release in a controlled way: feature flags, staged roll-outs or canaries when critical. Monitoring and alerting are configured before traffic arrives. Versioning in place (v1, v2 side by side) and a clear deprecation process. And yes, define ownership: who responds to incidents, who updates documentation, who signs off? That avoids noise and misunderstandings.

Step 6 — evolve and optimise

Step 6 — evolve and optimise.

Integrations live. We measure usage, error rates and latency, and steer accordingly. Sometimes an endpoint is too busy or too broad — then we split it. Sometimes the business wants event notifications instead of polling — then we add webhooks. Small iterations keep things healthy and allow growth without rebuilds.

Shall we really make your systems talk?

Shall we really make your systems talk?

We help you implement API development and integrations pragmatically — no unnecessary complexity, just robust choices. Share your challenges and landscape and we will think along with a route that works in your context. Coffee included?

Very practical: how to tackle integrations

Very practical: how to tackle integrations.

Apply it concretely in your landscape, step by step

Start small, prove value fast. Pick one process that costs lots of manual effort (for example customer data synchronisation). Create a neat API or webhook flow for it, including logging. You will see the benefit immediately and build support.

Technical choices that often work

  • choose REST when resources are central; GraphQL when clients need selective data

  • use OpenAPI/JSON Schema for validation and mocking

  • deploy an API gateway for policies, rate limiting and observability

  • remember: async with queues or event streaming for decoupling and peaks

Documentation and discoverability

  • make APIs discoverable via an Exchange or developer portal

  • publish examples and Postman collections

  • document breaking changes and versions explicitly

  • make error codes human: provide context, correlation IDs and clear remedy

Security and privacy

  • OAuth2/OIDC with scopes is often the standard

  • store no secrets in code, use a secrets manager

  • log enough for audit, but mask PII

  • run a permission audit periodically: who really has access?

Critical view: when not to use an API?

Critical view: when not to use an API?.

Sometimes a simple file transfer is better (really)

Not every integration needs a real-time API. For batch reports or nightly synchronisations a file (CSV/Parquet) via secure transfer is still fine. Fewer moving parts, less maintenance. That said, APIs often become more convenient later for near real-time insights.

Avoid unnecessary complexity

  • using an iPaaS for one simple link is overkill

  • microservices without clear boundaries create more integration work

  • do not start with five authentication variants; keep it consistent

  • beware “integration by exception” — standardise where possible

Vendor lock-in and exit strategy

  • abstract platform-specific features in your integration layer

  • define contracts in open standards

  • ensure data export and key rotation are scriptable

  • write the document “how do we ever migrate away from this?” before going live

Looking ahead: event-driven everything

Looking ahead: event-driven everything.

Integrate with events, APIs as the gateway

We see a clear shift to event-driven architectures. Systems publish events, others react asynchronously. APIs remain important as façade and for commands, but events decouple and scale more elegantly. Your landscape becomes more resilient and easier to adapt.

What this means in practice

  • combine REST/GraphQL for queries with events for mutations and notifications

  • use a schema registry and version your events

  • add idempotency and retries to avoid duplicates

  • enable end-to-end observability: tracing, metrics and structured logs

AI and integrations

  • AI-driven mapping and data enrichment are becoming normal

  • policy and governance around LLM APIs need extra attention (rate limits, PII)

  • apply a gateway policy set to LLM endpoints just like your core APIs

  • measure continuously: latency, cost, error profiles — keep iterating

Hans Lugtenberg

"A deal is a deal"

Yield.inc is a new asset manager in the Netherlands that focuses on excellent customer experience, sustainability and technology. When faced with the question of whether to develop our platform in-house or with a partner, we got in touch with Spartner. We are still 100% behind the choice for Spartner because we own the source code and with Spartner, a deal really is a deal, whether it concerns the delivery date or the agreed budget!

Hans Lugtenberg Partner at Yield Inc.

Norbert Wegter

"A professional software partner since 2010"

Spartner is involved and contributes in our search for innovations and always delivers top-notch work. After the first Huurda.nl version got out-dated, we collaboratively launched a completely new version in 2020.

Read more

Norbert Wegter Owner of 123wonen and Expat Homes Holland

"Doijer & Kalff"

After transferring our D&K portal to Spartner, we have elevated the further development and continuity to a higher level. Although the D&K platform was originally developed internally, our technical expert can now focus on other innovations within Doijer & Kalff. Spartner provides the quality we need without excessive costs. They have seamlessly taken over the care of our portal, allowing us to benefit from a flexible capacity that perfectly aligns with our future plans and innovation goals.

Reinier van Bergen Managing Director at Doijer & Kalff

Jurjen Terpstra

"Pragmatic and flexible collaboration"

Spartner has created a customized portal for us for the accountability of large-scale collaborative projects. This enables us and our partners to execute and account for their plans in a shared environment that is secure, transparent, and manageable. The pragmatic and flexible collaboration with Spartner has ensured that we have quickly achieved a functional and user-friendly environment.

Jurjen Terpstra Managing Partner at Wecreate Consulting

Marco Caspers

"AI and machine learning as legal tools"

In 2020, we transferred the development of Lynn to Spartner. As a result of their fast development process, the Lynn platform achieves an increasingly central role in the legal world.

Read more

Marco Caspers Software Development Manager at Lynn Legal

Bjorn Gubbels

"As a business you must dare to move forward"

Innovation and change are not always welcomed with equal enthusiasm by our employees, man is a creature of habit but as a company you have to dare to move forward and the need for a contemporary drawing program for the realization of various constructions with our Masterbloc bricks was high. For us but also for Spartner, this challenge was a bit of pioneering and together we had to overcome some hurdles to arrive at a beautiful and efficient business tool. A development and learning process for both parties, in which the feedback of questions and desired adjustments by our employees to Spartner was always in good consultation and we could count on quick feedback and targeted solutions. We continue to exchange experiences with Spartner and look back and forward to a successful collaboration.

Read more

Bjorn Gubbels Owner of Masterbloc

Marco Leenders

"Spartner extends our capabilities and development capacity"

With weekly calls, using our Azure DevOps sprint system, Spartner actively works together with our innovation, communication and software development departments.

Read more

Marco Leenders Head of Automation

Gemeente Groningen

"Flexible collaboration with yearly updates"

The projectteam of the city of Groningen is very enthusiastic about the "Roomfinder" platform.

Read more

Gemeente Groningen Projectteam

Josh Mountain

"Have been using Laravel Excel for years"

We requested custom help to a performance challenge we had in our implementation of Laravel Excel. I was amazed how quickly these Laravel artisans achieved significant performance gains, which saved us a lot of development time.

Read more

Josh Mountain Co-Founder at IncentivePilot.com

Maurice Evers

"Higher occupancy rate thanks to our user-friendly platform"

Throughout the great years that we cooperate with Spartner (previously Maatwebsite, Ed.), our software has been developed continuously. Students and landlords actively work with features like allocation, payments, chat, contract generation and more.

Read more

Maurice Evers Head of Student Housing Department

Maarten Bremer

"Innovating in the digital identification network of The Netherlands and Europe"

The pro-active approach of Spartner was crucial in understanding the complexity of the eHerkenning network.

Read more

Maarten Bremer CTO / Founder Ensured

Niels Winters

"Innovation in legal technology"

As jurists with knowledge of IT, we highly value quality; within code, but also in process. The high work-level and trustworthiness of Spartner gives us the capacity to continuously create innovative features.

Read more

Niels Winters Managing Director JuriBlox

Frequently asked questions about API development and integrations

Answers that genuinely help you move forward

How do I decide between REST and GraphQL? 🤔

It depends on the shape of your data and your clients. REST works well when resources and standard CRUD activities are central. GraphQL is handy when clients have variable data needs and want to reduce chatty calls. As mentioned earlier: choose what is simplest for your use case, not what sounds trendy.

Can you connect our systems without a complete rebuild? 🙂

Often yes. By building an integration layer that respects existing systems — and using webhooks, messaging and a gateway — you rarely need to change anything under the bonnet. Legacy and cloud can coexist nicely as long as contracts and security are clear.

How do we stop integrations becoming overly complex? 😅

Start design-first (OpenAPI), standardise policies in the gateway and pick one auth method. Work with a minimal viable integration and iterations. Make ownership explicit: who manages the API, who decides on versions, who responds to incidents? Without that, complexity quietly grows.

What pitfalls do you see time and again? 🧩

Endpoints that are too broad (all-in-one), no version policy, missing monitoring, and no error handling for downstream time-outs. Also popular: documentation that lags behind. Quick tip: automate documentation and contract tests so you are not dependent on stray wikis.

How do you secure APIs properly? 🔐

Think in layers: authentication (OAuth2/OIDC), authorisation (scopes/roles), input validation, rate limiting and mTLS where needed. Encrypt secrets, rotate keys and log with correlation IDs. And test abuse scenarios too (fuzzing, brute force). It may feel strict, but it pays off twice over.

Is an iPaaS always required for integrations? 🧰

No. It is useful with many links, hybrid patterns or governance demands. But for simple flows a lightweight integration service or direct API is perfectly fine. Choose what fits — over-engineering is costly and fragile.

What if a supplier only provides CSV files? 📄

No problem. Orchestrate a secure ETL route and publish the result via an internal API. This keeps the outside modern while the source can remain “old-school”. Later you can modernise step by step without a big bang.

How do you ensure teams reuse APIs instead of building new ones? 🔁

Make them discoverable. A developer portal or Exchange with search, samples and clear ownership helps enormously. Add analytics so you can see which APIs are used — and which are duplicated. Reuse must be easy and visibly rewarding.

When should you choose synchronous calls and when events? 🧭

Synchronous when you need immediate feedback (think payment status). Asynchronous for peaks, long-running tasks or low coupling. A hybrid model (request via API, processing via event) often works best, especially with legacy at the back end.

Can you also monitor and manage our integrations? 👀

Absolutely. Observability is not an afterthought. With metrics, tracing and alerting you spot anomalies early and can act precisely. That said, your own team remains key: together we divide roles and safeguard knowledge so you are not dependent on a single party.

Feel like a cup of coffee?

Whether you have a new idea or an existing system that needs attention?

We are happy to have a conversation with you.

Call, email, or message us on WhatsApp.

Bart Schreurs
Business Development Manager
Bart Schreurs

We have received your message. We will contact you shortly. Something went wrong sending your message. Please check all the fields.